Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Leadership in Business Visionary Leadership In Business

Question: Discuss about the Leadership in Business for Visionary Leadership In Business Schools? Answer: Introduction Almog-Bareket (2012) has opined that production is the accumulation of land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship and in this regards, leadership is the primary factor that makes everything work together seamlessly. Therefore, it can be stated that without leadership all the business resources are ineffective. In order to understand the impact of the major organizational exchanges on the corporate team of the selected corporation, a detailed style on the changed leadership style has been analyzed. For this particular research work, Big Brothers Big Sisters of America (BBBSA) has been taken into consideration. It has been seen that the company has suffered due to the relocation of their headquarters twice in the last three years and this affected the company growth as well as the displacement of the countless employees. Apart from that, it has also been found that the three CEO of the company have changed since 2009 and this has affected the company unsurprisingly. Therefore, the task aims to analyze the impact of the major organizational changes in the corporate team of the selected company and to provide some of the effective recommendations to deal with the situation carefully. Current situation in Big Brothers Big Sisters of America (BBBSA) Big Brothers and Big Sisters of America is one of the oldest as well as largest youth mentoring organizations in the United States. This organization mentors children, all ages in the communities across the country. Avolio et al. (2013) have said that it seldom happens that a reputed nonprofit organization moves its headquarters and this is more unusual when this incident takes place twice within a few years. Reports have stated that this non-profit organization left Philadelphia headquarter in 2013 for Irving , Texas, moving into a multifaceted owned by one of its biggest associates and that also housed BBBS International. However, it has been seen that the headquarters of this organization hit the road for Tampa just after two years. It has been observed that Pam Iorio, the CEO of the company stated that the move to Tampa was a great part, so there could be a long-term continuance of management. After OIG audit, it was tough for the company to raise fund and one of the major reason s for shifting the new area was due to this issue. However, it has been found that the organization was saving money in Tampa through a rent free five-year lease. However, a move from Philadelphia to Irving came soon just after a new CEO was hired (Gerstner Day, 1997). Therefore, it has been seen that this organization has changed its headquarter with the change of their CEO (Start Something for a child today-Big Brothers Big Sisters, 2016). Issues in relocating its corporate headquarters in the last 3 years It has been seen that there are almost 200,000 volunteers engaged in Big Brothers and Big Sister of America and they are highly productive as well as happy with their services. Pam Iorio, the CEO of this non-profit organization stated that the relocation of their headquarter in Tampa will undoubtedly grow as well as prosper in the positive business and philanthropic climate. It is important to mention that this organization is one of the leading nonprofit organizations and thus they want to move to such places that are comparatively less costly. Therefore, from the company viewpoint, it can be said that the organization has adopted right decision but from the employee viewpoint, relocating of headquarter has hampered the organization to some extent (Graen Uhl-Bien, 1995). Moreover, it can be said that the change in CEO depicts the change in leadership style and this change as well affect the performance of the employees. The organizational structures of the company depend on the CEO of the company and change in leadership style leave impact on the employee performance. Therefore, the employees are required to cope up with the new as well as changed nature of leadership and this has decreased the productivity level of the employees in the workplace (Hoption, 2014). Three leadership changes during the last 6 years Previously Charles Pierson and Pam Iorio was the CEO of this nonprofit organization named Big Brothers Big Sisters and at present Micheal Lawrence has served the post of CEO. From news, it has been seen that with the change of CEOs, headquarter of this organization hasshifted and this is one of the major issues of the company. The changed nature of leadership has affected the work procedure of the employees largely and this is no doubt one of the major concerns for the employees (Jiang et al., 2014). Impact of major organizational changes on the corporate team at BBBSA Leader-member relationship is one of the strong relationships that are discussed at the time of a newly appointed leader. From the reports and news, it has been seen that the CEOs of this non-profit organization have been changed largely and this affected the leadership style of the organization from several perspectives. Therefore, it can be stated that the company is required to look at leader-member relationship along with its quality and characteristics and the exchanges between a leader and their subordinates as being the construct of leadership. Different leaders have different leadership style and this change the organizational structure of the company. As BBBSA is one of the largest volunteer organizations, it is obvious enough to say that the changed nature of leadership has affected the volunteers. Apart from the changed nature of leadership, relocation of the headquarters as well has demotivated the volunteers (Kangas, 2013). Kelley (1988) has said that the companys success or failure, compete or crumble, entirely depends on the basis of how they are led. Therefore, it is required to look at the great leaders of the company in the past and in present in order to understand the changes in the organization. In case of leadership, it is important to mention that followership of the volunteers is one of the important components of leadership and thus it helps the volunteers to broaden their perceptions about followership and promote followership behaviors that actively contribute to the concerned organization (Voegtlin, Patzer Scherer, 2012). Parris Peachey (2013) have opined that bosses or the higher executives are not necessarily good leaders and at the same time, they are not importantly effective followers as well. Therefore, it can be said that followership cannot dominate the thinking process of the employees because preoccupation with leadership keeps employees from considering the nature and the importance of the followers. Riggio (2014) has clearly demonstrated in his work that the being volunteer is a different occupation from other employment types and most of the volunteers get engaged to this profession keeping in mind an idol. Therefore, the leadership in the organization is required to be in such a manner that can make an employee highly enthusiastic, intelligent and self-reliant participation (Voegtlin, Patzer Scherer, 2012). Recommendations After going through the present condition of this nonprofit organization, it can be said that the volunteers, as well as the employees of this organization, are going through two major issues and this has been affecting their services. After analyzing the situation, it can be recommended that the company can expand their branches in different parts, but they must not relocate their branches. These fast changes raise a sense of uncertainty among the employees and the service receivers. The CEO of the company as well as the management of this organization is required to look at this part carefully from the employee perspective (Voegtlin, Patzer Scherer, 2012). Apart from that, it can be stated that the changed style, as well as nature of leadership, has affected the performance of the employees of the company. The employees once get accustomed to one style of direction and then it is tough for them to change their activities with the fast change of the leadership style. It has been seen that three CEO of this organization have changed since 2009 and no doubt it has affected the corporate team. Once the employees of the organization get accustomed to one leadership style, another style of the newly appointed CEO forces the employees to change the approach. Therefore, this part is required to take care of immediately, in order to bring stability in the overall process of the company activities (Riggio, 2014). Conclusion After completion of the entire task, it has been found that Big Brothers Big Sisters of America has suffered in some cases due to the impact of some major organizational changes on the corporate team. The two major moves related to the headquarter in 3 years have cost millions of dollars and this has affected the financial stability of this nonprofit organization. Moreover, the three CEO changes since 2009 have also influenced the corporate team of the company negatively. Addressed issues in the organizations have been analyzed and evaluated through detailed analysis and based on the analysis, some of the effective recommendations have been provided to the management of the company in order to deal with the situation carefully. References Almog-Bareket, G. (2012). Visionary leadership in business schools: an institutional framework.Journal of management development,31(4), 431-440. Avolio, Bruce J., Francis J. Yammarino, eds.(2013) Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Emerald Group Publishing, 2013. Gerstner, C. R., Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leadermember exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.Journal of applied psychology,82(6), 827. Graen, G. B., Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly,6(2), 219-247. Hoption, C. (2014). Learning and Developing Followership.Journal of Leadership Education,13(3). Jiang, J. Y., Law, K. S., Sun, J. J. (2014). LeaderMember Relationship and Burnout: The Moderating Role of Leader Integrity. à ©Ã‚ ¢Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¥Ã‚ ¯Ã‚ ¼Ãƒ ¯Ã‚ ¼Ã‚  à ¦Ã‹â€ Ã‚ Ãƒ ¥Ã¢â‚¬ËœÃ‹Å"à ¥Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã‚ ³Ãƒ §Ã‚ ³Ã‚ »Ãƒ ¤Ã‚ ¸Ã… ½Ãƒ ¤Ã‚ ¸Ã¢â‚¬ ¹Ãƒ ¥Ã‚ ±Ã… ¾Ãƒ ¥Ã‚ ·Ã‚ ¥Ãƒ ¤Ã‚ ½Ã…“à ¥Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¦Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Ãƒ ¯Ã‚ ¼Ã… ¡ à ©Ã‚ ¢Ã¢â‚¬  Ãƒ ¥Ã‚ ¯Ã‚ ¼Ãƒ ¦Ã‚ ­Ã‚ £Ãƒ §Ã¢â‚¬ ºÃ‚ ´Ãƒ §Ã… ¡Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ãƒ ¨Ã‚ °Ã†â€™Ãƒ ¨Ã‚ §Ã‚ £Ãƒ ¤Ã‚ ½Ã…“à §Ã¢â‚¬ Ã‚ ¨.Management and Organization Review,10(2), 223-247. Kangas, H. M. (2013). The development of the LMX relationships after a newly appointed leader enters an organization.Human Resource Development International,16(5), 575-589. Kelley, R. E. (1988).In praise of followers(pp. 1-8). Harvard Business Review Case Services. Parris, D. L., Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts.Journal of business ethics,113(3), 377-393. Riggio, R. E. (2014). Followership Research: Looking Back and Looking Forward.Journal of Leadership Education,13(4). Start Something for a child today-Big Brothers Big Sisters. (2016). Bbbs.org. Retrieved 11 March 2016, from https://www.bbbs.org/ Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics,105(1), 1-16.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.